FFA Working Papers 5:001 (2023)582

Machine Learning Applications to Valuation of Options on Non-liquid Markets

Jiří Witzany, Milan Fičura
Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Prague University of Economics and Business

Recently, there has been a considerable interest in machine learning (ML) applications to valuation of options. The main motivation is the speed of calibration or, for example, calculation of the credit valuation adjustments (CVA). It is usually assumed that there is a relatively liquid market with plain vanilla option quotations that can be used to calibrate (using an ML model) the volatility surface, or to estimate parameters of an advanced stochastic model. In the second stage the calibrated volatility surface (or the model parameters) are used to value given exotic options, again using a trained NN (or another ML model). The NNs are typically trained “off-line” by sampling many model and market parameters´ combinations and calculating the options´ market values. In our research, we focus on the quite common situation of a non-liquid option market where we lack sufficiently many plain vanilla option quotations to calibrate the volatility surface, but we still need to value an exotic option or just a plain vanilla option subject to a more advanced stochastic model as it is typical on energy and carbon derivative markets. We show that it is possible to use selected moments of the underlying historical price return series complemented with a volatility risk premium estimate to value such options using the ML approach.

Keywords: derivatives valuation, options, calibration, neural networks
JEL classification: C45, C63, G13

Received: January 24, 2023; Revised: January 24, 2023; Accepted: February 22, 2023; Published online: January 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Witzany, J., & Fičura, M. (2023). Machine Learning Applications to Valuation of Options on Non-liquid Markets. FFA Working Papers5, Article 2023.001. https://doi.org/10.XXXX/xxx.2023.001
Download citation

References

  1. Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the sceptics: yes standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review. 39 (4): 885-905. Go to original source...
  2. Bates, David S. (1996). Jumps and Stochastic volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicity in Deutsche Mark Options. The Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), 69-107. Go to original source...
  3. Büchel, P., Kratochwil, M., Nagl, M., & Rösch, D. (2021). Deep calibration of financial models: turning theory into practice. Review of Derivatives Research, 1-28. Go to original source...
  4. Cao, J., Chen, J., Hull, J., & Poulos, Z. (2022). Deep Learning for Exotic Option Valuation. The Journal of Financial Data Science, 4(1), 41-53. Go to original source...
  5. Culkin, R., & Das, S. R. (2017). Machine learning in finance: the case of deep learning for option pricing. Journal of Investment Management, 15(4), 92-100.
  6. Eraker, B., Johannes M., & Polson, M. (2003). The Impact of Jumps in Volatility and Returns, The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1269-1300 Go to original source...
  7. Ferguson, R., & Green, A. (2018). Deeply learning derivatives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02233.
  8. Ficura, M., & Witzany, J. (2016). Estimating Stochastic Volatility and Jumps Using High-Frequency Data and Bayesian Methods. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), 66(4), 278-301.
  9. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. H. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction (Vol. 2, pp. 1-758). New York: springer. Go to original source...
  10. Hernandez, A. (2017). Model calibration with neural networks. Risk. Go to original source...
  11. Heston, S. L. (1993). A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options. The Review of Financial Studies.,6 (2), 327-343. Go to original source...
  12. Hornik, K. (1991). Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural networks, 4(2), 251-257. Go to original source...
  13. Horvath, B., Muguruza, A., & Tomas, M. (2021). Deep learning volatility: a deep neural network perspective on pricing and calibration in (rough) volatility models. Quantitative Finance, 21(1), 11 Go to original source...
  14. Hull, J., & White, A. (1987). The pricing of options on assets with stochastic volatilities. The Journal of Finance, 42(2), 281-300. Go to original source...
  15. Hutchinson, J. M., Lo, A. W., & Poggio, T. (1994). A nonparametric approach to pricing and hedging derivative securities via learning networks. The Journal of Finance, 49(3), 851-889. Go to original source...
  16. Jacquier, E., Johannes, M., & Polson, N. (2007). MCMC maximum likelihood for latent state models. Journal of Econometrics, 137(2), 615-640. Go to original source...
  17. Liu, S., Borovykh, A., Grzelak, L. A., & Oosterlee, C. W. (2019). A neural network-based framework for financial model calibration. Journal of Mathematics in Industry, 9(1), 1-28. Go to original source...
  18. Melino, A. and S. M. Turnbull (1990). Pricing foreign currency options with stochastic volatility, Journal of Econometrics, 45, 239-265. Go to original source...
  19. Shephard, N. (2004). Stochastic Volatility: Selected Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 534. Go to original source...
  20. Yan, X. S., (2002). Valuation of commodity derivatives in a new multi-factor model, Review of Derivatives Research, Vol.5, No.3, pp.251-271. Go to original source...